Sand Control Completion Failures: Can We Talk the Same Language?

Authors

  • Abraham Faga Schlumberger Oilfield Services
  • Brian T Wagg C-FER Technologies
  • Howard L McKinzie

Abstract

Several operators have recently launched a new industry-wide initiative on sand control reliability. The aim of the initiative is to gain a better understanding of Sand Control Completion (SCC) systems and equipment performance and reliability in a variety of applications. It focuses on assisting the industry to improve SCC performance and service life through sharing of failure information, operational practices, and other pertinent data. One of the key challenges in this effort is how to achieve consistency in the data collected by several operators. This paper presents an approach to establish consistent practices for collecting, tracking and sharing SCC reliability and failure information. The approach is based on two key elements: (1) a general and common data set; and (2) a standard nomenclature for coding SCC failure information. The general data set contains basic information on operating conditions, SCC systems and equipment, and the observed failures. While this data set is not overly detailed, in that the information is typically already collected by most operators and relatively easy to obtain, it is comprehensive enough so that meaningful analyses can be performed. The nomenclature standard builds on the International Standard IS0 14224 that stipulates broad definitions and failure attributes related to collection and exchange of reliability and maintenance data for equipment used in the petroleum industry. The paper also provides a review of past industry efforts to track SCC system reliability in terms of the types of data collected, and the main types of analyses performed with the data. Comments are included on difficult issues such as how to define failure of a sand control completion. It is hoped that the paper will encourage discussion on the topic, and help the industry share SCC reliability and failure data in a more consistent manner. The ultimate goals of this work are to assist the industry in improving SCC service life; improving the basis for selecting sand control systems and equipment; and better realizing the full potential of SCC technologies.

Author Biography

Abraham Faga, Schlumberger Oilfield Services

Dr. Faga has an operating company background and over 14 years of international experience in drilling and completions operations. He has managed and played lead technical roles in numerous onshore and offshore (West Africa, the North Sea and Russia) oil and gas field developments for Shell and Schlumberger. Abraham has been closely involved in several challenging operations involving well planning, design and drilling of horizontal wells, extended reach wells, multilateral wells etc., as well as the selection and implementation of new drilling and completion technologies. Since joining C-FER in 2003, Abraham has managed and/or conducted a number of single- and multi-client research and development as well as drilling and completion engineering consulting projects. Abraham has a PhD in petroleum engineering from Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen. His Ph.D. thesis was on the use of neural network techniques for predicting grain-size distribution in clastic reservoirs for sand control systems design and evaluation. He is a chartered engineer (UK) and is registered, with the Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta (APEGGA). Abraham is actively involved in several professional societies including the Society of Petroleum Engineers (Edmonton Section), the Canadian Association of Drilling Engineers (CADE), the Canadian Heavy Oil Association (CHOA), the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy (IMM), and APEGGA. Abraham is a member of the Council of Energy Advisors (Gerson Lehrman Group).

Downloads

Published

2006-07-12

Issue

Section

Research